SOS Redouble 6/3
June 4, 2008 – 12:26 pmSOS Redouble 6/3
Here’s a hand from Tuesday 6/3 in Vineyard Haven. South deals, both sides vulnerable.
♠ KJ92
♥ AJ87
♦ AKQ6
♣ 2
N
♠ A843 ♠ 6
♥ T9654 ♥ KQ2
♦ 843 W E ♦ JT72
♣ J ♣ AQ975
S
♠ QT75
♥ 3
♦ 95
♣ KT8643
This is North-South’s spade hand. Anita Persson and Carol Whitmarsh bid 4♠ and made five (+650). Rhonda Cohen and Eric Strikof made four (+620). Two other pairs bid 2♠ and made three and four (+140, +170). One pair went down at 4♠.
The bidding was different at our table:
South West North East
(me) (Nancy)
Pass Pass 1♦ 2♣
Pass* Pass** Dble*** Pass
Pass# Rdble## Pass 2♦###
Pass 2♥ all pass
North’s opening bid is normal. The hand is too strong for a mini-Roman 2♦, the only other choice. Nancy overcalls 2♣ vulnerable with 12 HCP plus a singleton, also the normal bid.
* South has a problem. If she chooses to make a negative double here, N-S will find their spade game, but she has only 5 HCP plus distribution, and her length is in Nancy’s suit. Pass and see what happens is not an unreasonable choice.
** I don’t like it, but I pass this hand with 5 HCP. I expect that N-S will bid again, and so Nancy won’t be stuck with 2♣ on a 5-1 trump fit, and . . .
*** . . . and sure enough, North makes a reopening double (for takeout), expecting South to say something. . .
# . . . but what South “says” is to convert the reopening double to penalties. This is a very good bid. In clubs, N-S should take three diamonds, a heart or two, and probably four clubs. They would have collected at least +800, more than their spade game is worth. (At another table 3♣ was down four undoubled - that South should have doubled!).
## This is an SOS Redouble. I know that North’s double likely indicates both high-card strength and shortness in clubs. South’s Pass indicates length and strength in clubs, behind Nancy. An SOS Redouble says, “Partner, we’re in a terrible spot. Please bid some other suit.” (In the direct position, we play that a Redouble indicates 10 or more HCP, but that can’t be the case in the pass-out seat at a low level.)
### Nancy should have bid 2♥, but she bid 2♦ thinking that North’s opening might have been based on a 3-card suit. I took her 2♦ to be a cue bid asking me to pick one of the two unbid suits (lucky I didn’t pick spades!).
The opening lead was the ♣2. I took the ♣A and led a spade to my ♠A. I led a heart toward the board, and North played low and the ♥K won. When I ruffed a club, I was over-ruffed, and North cashed three diamonds. North got two more hearts (three in all), but that was all. Down one (-100) meant that we were beaten on the hand only by the E-W pair who found a way to set 4♠.
At another table E-W were down four doubled at 3♥ (-1100). I suspect that West may have finessed on the first club lead. That was the top N-S score.
Here are the results from 6/3. 8 tables in play. N/S 1. David Donald & Michele Riel. 2. Duncan & Jocelyn Walton. 3. Claus Buchthal & Sari Lipkin. E/W 1. Bob Roach & Diane Clayton. 2. Bill Blakesley & Hugh Knipmeyer. 3. Dan & Nancy Cabot.
Dan Cabot is a contributing editor at The Times.


One Response to “SOS Redouble 6/3”
(This question is attached to the Mini-Roman blog. I’ve copied it here.) Dan - not a comment, but a question. As you may remember I was south and Gail Farrish was north on the hand from 6/3 that you posted on the blog. We have discussed the bidding ad nauseum and are curious about how you would find the spades given the bidding through your SOS? Thanks in advance and thanks for the blog - it is great fun and informative!
Patsy: It’s hard for N-S to get back in the auction after 2Hearts! It’s going to be up to North (Gail) who has the big hand. When 2Hearts is passed around to you, you have nowhere to go. But if North doubles, I think I would think it is for penalties and leave it in, which will get a bad result as it turns out. Perhaps the safest for Gail would be to cue-bid 3Hearts. Since that can’t be to play, it has to be asking you to support diamonds or bid spades or maybe NT. You would bid 3Spades (not 4Spades with your 5 HCP), which she would probably pass.
By Dan Cabot on Jun 4, 2008