Legal snag puts West Tisbury, Housing Trust, at odds
By Steve Myrick
Published: January 21, 2010
The 250 State Road affordable housing development hit a bump in the road at the West Tisbury planning board last week, when board members balked at legal language intended to keep the homes affordable in perpetuity.
Developers say that the language, in the form of a rider to the ground leases, is standard language used in many affordable housing transactions, including some by the town of West Tisbury itself.
But the board is researching the issue, and members have raised the possibility that $570,000 in Community Preservation Act funds already approved, may have to go before another vote at the spring town meeting.
The homes will be sold to qualified buyers at a substantial discount, based on the family income of the buyer. There are many safeguards built into the transaction to ensure that a home remains affordable. But in order to finance the home, many banks want the option to sell the home at market rate, if the owner defaults on the mortgage and the home goes into foreclosure.
Island Housing Trust executive director Philippe Jordi said foreclosure is unlikely. "We have various protections built into the ground lease that allow us to purchase the property before, during, and after foreclosure," he said, adding that the trust did just that last year for a home in Tisbury. The trust quickly sold it to another qualified family under affordability guidelines.
Mr. Jordi said in the unlikely event that a bank forecloses and sells a home at market rate, it would have to refund to the town any CPA money used to finance that home.
But members of the planning board put the brakes on his request to attach the standard rider. Board member Virginia Jones said that a special permit was issued for the development, though it faced considerable opposition. One condition of that permit was that the homes remain under affordability guidelines in perpetuity.
"The planning board was pretty united that we need to consider it further," Ms. Jones said. "We've done quite a bit of research." She added the annual town meeting voted CPA funds for a specific proposal, and attaching the rider might require another town meeting vote.
"Those funds were predicated on the basis that the affordability is in perpetuity," Ms. Jones said. "We have to be very careful when people have voted on things based on certain promises. You have to be very careful how you examine them. I certainly intend to be."







