|

Weather
missing? Click here


 
 






|

The
Martha's Vineyard Times is a weekly publication.
March 31 - April 6, 2005 Edition
Web
Comments
- Email Submissions
EDITORIAL
CPA,
yes
March 31, 2005
This
page favors the adoption of the Community Preservation Act by voters
in Tisbury, Oak Bluffs, Edgartown, and West Tisbury, just as we favored
its adoption by Chilmark and Aquinnah in 2001.
The record shows that funding under the CPA, including especially
the state's matching contribution, can make significant contributions
to town efforts to preserve open space, protect historic property,
and fund affordable housing efforts. The reason voters in four Island
towns will face the CPA question in this town meeting season is that
advocates of affordable housing believe - correctly, we think - that
housing for modest income folks is a crucial community concern, and
funding through the CPA may make possible important advances in the
provision of that housing.
The CPA is a flexible and responsive tool that guarantees to town
voters that they will annually decide how to deploy CPA money among
the three eligible categories for CPA spending. This flexibility ought
to attract support from voters in the three down-Island towns, some
of whom may argue with considerable justification that their communities
have already done a great deal to increase the stock of affordable
housing. With the CPA in place, Edgartown, Oak Bluffs, and Tisbury
may continue to expand housing or allocate CPA funds differently as
time goes on to serve conservation or preservation needs, according
to the voters' interests.
But, it is affordable housing that is the focus of this town meeting
season, because despite a remarkable, four-year-old political consensus
among Islanders in support of affordable housing, and despite a wide
variety of efforts to develop and subsidize the provision of affordable
housing in recent years, we are falling behind. Preliminary findings
by a consultant who is updating the 2001 housing survey done for the
Island Affordable Housing Fund show that population, jobs, wages,
and family incomes have grown handsomely enough since 2001, but housing
prices have leapt more than 45 percent and as much as 80 percent.
Consultant John Ryan writes, The market forces driving up prices
on Martha's Vineyard have only accelerated the affordability gap that
existed in 2001. If it were not for the work going on to create a
supply of affordable community housing, neither long-term renters
or young Island households would have much reason to hope for a future
on Martha's Vineyard. But much has been done, and that is cause for
both hope and celebration. The cost of continuing to create this supply
of housing reserved for ordinary working residents only goes up as
the cost of housing rises. Maintaining the commitment to securing
the funds needed to continue this effort is crucial to the character
of the Island's residents and workforce.
There is no quick or inexpensive way out of this fix. Just as the
Land Bank cannot protect all the wonderful Vineyard places that ought
to be preserved, publicly subsidized housing efforts will never meet
the continuing and growing need for affordable shelter. But taxpayers
must support some of the many strategies that must be brought to bear
on the problem. Leveraging modest town real estate taxpayer contributions
with state matching funds will help provide a badly needed source
of reliable funding for housing initiatives of all sorts, tailored
to the individual goals of the six Island towns. The CPA deserves
approval by voters in the three down-Island towns and West Tisbury.
|
| Send
this page to a friend:
|
|
©The
Martha's Vineyard Times 2004 - www.mvtimes.com
|
| |
|








|