The Aquinnah select board unanimously voted to add a consideration for electronic voting machines for future town meetings in the warrant article. Aquinnah town moderator Mike Hebert was the one who proposed the idea.
“I feel that it might make things go more smoothly, save a little time, and also give people in the audience who are voting anonymity,” Hebert said. “There’s been some feel in town that’s something [voters] would really like.”
Meridia Interactive Solutions representative Peter Babel, whose company supplies electronic voting systems, was invited to present to the board about this. According to Babel, there are 32 towns in Massachusetts using Meridia’s electronic voting system, with three more towns on the way this month. Instead of raising hands or using paper to vote, Meridia’s system is a hand-held, two-button keypad for yes or no answers. “It cannot get simpler than that,” he said.
Babel said people will only be able to see the total number of votes on a screen, but the results can only be known after the voting is closed. This system also allows people to change their vote until the voting is closed. Additionally, the system uses radio frequency for its connection, so the internet is not needed.
“We have spent, as you pointed out, a substantial amount of time during town meetings: counting votes, standing up, sitting down, and all of that, and all of the delays,” Aquinnah select board member Tom Murphy said during the question and answer period. “This will bring our voting process to the 21st century, which would be a welcome change from my perspective.”
Aquinnah select board chair Gary Haley was also in favor of the electronic voting system, pointing out the importance of anonymity during the voting process.
“Is there going to be time for a public hearing on this issue?” Aquinnah resident Jamie Vanderhoop asked.
Getting feedback from Aquinnah residents would be the next step, Herbert answered.
Another member of the public asked whether there would be a trial period to test it out. Babel said Meridia’s policy was to take back a system if a town is dissatisfied after a purchase. Additionally, Meridia staff can be at the meetings to help run it.
Westwood is a town that has done this.
Murphy said the price quote the board received was $5,220 for the machines. Aquinnah town administrator Jeffrey Madison said the town does not have enough funds in the budget to pay for the voting system.
Voters will be asked to fund the machines at the annual town meeting in May.
In other business, the board unanimously voted to delay the decision about the use of 9 Aquinnah Circle. In a previous meeting, the use of the building was under debate because of the lack of voices from Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) members. The issue was sent to town counsel Ron Rappaport for review. Murphy and Haley said they did not have a chance to look over the report Rappaport sent back. The board unanimously voted to delay the discussion until the next meeting.
The board unanimously approved extending Aquinnah’s scalloping period for another 30 days to clear out the old scallops from Menemsha Pond, as the Aquinnah shellfish committee put it.
The board unanimously approved placing the committee’s request for funds on the warrant because codium, a Japanese aquatic plant, is “smothering Menemsha Pond.” Haley, in relaying the correspondence, read aloud a racial slur that references Japanese people, but was quickly called out by Madison. Haley then referred to the invasive species as “Japanese grass.”
The Aquinnah shellfish committee wanted to put a request for funds on the warrant article to get rid of the invasive species.

NO! Nothing wrong with a piece of paper…doesn’t pollute and has worked for years. Stop buying toys that become trash, made of plastic, right? What’s wrong with you people! Paper ballots for less than 100 people at a town meeting too much for you!
Great– now when a democrat wins the republicans can whine and cry in their pillows for years about how they really won and the “dems” stole the election..
Oh well, at least it might get them to stop whining about critical race theory, gender identity and the books they are burning.
Hey Don. When you have fully charged your EV, meander (slowly) to Aquinnah Town Hall and look at century old voting machine crank box. Kind of archaic but id does put a damper on several of the favorite Democrat voting tactics; grave yard searches for names on headstones to register/vote, Ballot harvesting and voters going from one county to another on Election Day to name just a few. Surely we don’t have that on our quaint little island but the Democrat mindset is there for sure. The Aquinnah moderator who recommended an almost foolproof system should be commended not chastised by you or anyone else
Can you prove any of the allegations you’re making against Democratic voters? Because last time I checked, the majority of the whopping 475 proven cases of voter fraud in the 2020 election were committed by Republican voters.
https://news.yahoo.com/ap-looked-2020-vote-fraud-120554815.html
Hmmmm ! Your reference article hinges on reporting from AP and WAPO, not quite the bastions of accurate and unbiased news. I suggest you dig a little deeper…………enough said !
What a monumentally stupid idea! The island town with the smallest population doesn’t need electronic voting machines. One person could literally hand count every ballot in a presidential year in less than an hour.
Rscott— exactly—
According to the lead paragraph, Aquinnah is considering an electronic voting system for town meetings, replacing the traditional show-of-hands . . . not (as other comments suggest) in local, state, or national elections, replacing paper ballots.
The town’s stated reason for considering the change (the electronic system would offer town-meeting voters anonymity, which the current method does not) is not weakened but strengthened by Aquinnah’s small voting population, whose members get less cover from the “anonymity of the crowd” than town-meeting voters in more populous Island towns.
If we’re going to debate Aquinnah’s proposal we should at least debate the *actual* proposal.
We do not have to raise our hands at town meetings, if we want…the voters have always been able to choose paper privacy/anonymity.